The statute of limitations for sexual harassment in California is that a victim must file a charge of discrimination with the Department of Fair Employment and Housing (DFEH) within ONE YEAR from the date of the last incident of sexual harassment. The victim then has the option to ask the DFEH to investigate the claim or to immediately receive a right to sue letter. The right to sue letter from the DFEH advises the victim that they have an additional one year from the date of the right to sue letter to file a complaint in the California Superior Court for sexual harassment against the perpetrator and/or the responsible employer.

A victim also has the option of filing a charge of discrimination first with the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC), but the time limits for filing for charge with the EEOC are shorter than for the right to sue letter from the DFEH. For the EEOC, a victim has 180 days from the date of the last incident to file a charge of discrimination. The time is extended to 300 days from the date of the last incident or 30 days after receiving notice of a case closure from the DFEH, if the victim also files a parallel claim of discrimination with the DFEH.

California Government Code Section 12960(d) sets forth some exceptions for the extension of the one year statute of limitations for filing a claim of discrimination with the DFEH.

There is some case law that gives relief to victims who attempt to file a claim of discrimination with the EEOC, but when the claim is not completed. Case law allows some liberality in construing an attempt to file a claim with the EEOC as sufficient to comply with the statute of limitations for someone who has made an effort, but the effort was unsuccessful, particularly due to the EEOC failing to complete the in-take process.

Bookmark this website:
  • del.icio.us
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Furl
  • Google Bookmarks
  • MySpace
  • Propeller
  • Reddit
  • StumbleUpon
  • TwitThis
  • Broderick Law Firm
    2600 El Camino Real, Suite 506
    Palo Alto, CA 94306
    650.857.9000 Phone
    650.857.1100 Fax
    brodericklaw@brodericklaw.com

  • The Broderick Law Firm for Victims of Sexual Harassment and Employment Discrimination

    Sexual Harassment and Discrimination

    Sexual harassment can include unwelcome sexual advances, requests for sexual favors, verbal conduct, or physical conduct which affect or interfere with an individual’s work performance or create an offensive work environment for that individual.

    Sexual discrimination can include failure to hire or adverse employment action due to gender or sexual orientation. The Broderick Law Firm believes strongly in the fair treatment of all individuals regardless of sex and is committed to representing individuals who have been victims of sexual harassment in the workplace. Mr. Broderick has the experience and knowledge necessary to help you recover the damages you are due. He will vigorously pursue your claim of sexual harassment or sexual discrimination to get you a positive result.

    “Quid Pro Quo” Sexual Harassment

    “Quid Pro Quo” sexual harassment is when a supervisor makes sexual conduct of an employee a condition for employment benefits or advancement or a condition for avoiding adverse employment action or for advancement.

    Hostile Work Environment Sexual Harassment

    Hostile work environment sexual harassment occurs when an employee is subject to unwelcome sexual advances or offensive gender-related language or behavior that is sufficiently severe or pervasive from the perspective of a reasonable person with the same fundamental characteristics as the offended employee.

    This type of harassment must be sufficiently severe or pervasive to alter the conditions of the offended employee’s employment and create an abusive environment. A single instance of sexual harassment in the “hostile work environment” context may be sufficient, but repeated instances increase the severity of the events, so that a reasonable person would be more likely to find the conduct sexually harassing due to its repetition.

    In regard to unwanted sexual advances, a complaining employee must generally show that he or she gave notice that the advances are unwelcome.

    Although favoritism by a supervisor towards an employee with whom the supervisor is having a consensual sexual affair does not ordinarily constitute harassment of other employees, a pattern of sexual favoritism may constitute a hostile work environment in the event that the message by management is that sexual affairs are a way to get ahead in the workplace.

    Retaliation

    It is illegal for an employer to retaliate against a sexual harassment or discrimination victim for making a claim of sexual harassment, for participating in a sexual harassment investigation, or for opposing discriminatory practices.

    Bookmark this website:
    • del.icio.us
    • Digg
    • Facebook
    • Furl
    • Google Bookmarks
    • MySpace
    • Propeller
    • Reddit
    • StumbleUpon
    • TwitThis